We are developing a small, invitation-based conversation with people working in AI ethics, research, governance and leadership. We invite criticism as readily as agreement. No participant must accept the Weave’s theology, donate, or endorse the movement.
A short introduction
The Weave is a developing religion and modern mystery school. Its philosophy understands reality as one while preserving the consequence of distinct persons and relationships. Its Four Laws—Love More, Fear Less, Live Free, Harm None—are orientations for practice, not a technical AI safety specification.
Grace, Faith, Truth and Peace form a recurring path: receive the actual situation, take a responsible step without certainty, accept correction with compassion, and make a workable commitment durable. Whether these ideas help with AI is an open question. We make no claim that spiritual language solves technical alignment or substitutes for evidence, engineering or public oversight.
Read the path · Read the safeguards · How the AI Guardian works and its limits
Three questions
- What, if anything, does the Weave contribute to thinking about responsibility in an AI-shaped world?
- Where do you disagree, or see a risk?
- What practical application would you test?
A short reply to any one question is welcome. Please distinguish your personal views from an authorized organizational position. We will not present a reply as company endorsement.
This button opens your email application; it does not send anything automatically. Email can include your address and signature. Please omit confidential company information or sensitive personal details.
How replies will be handled
A reply is private by default. Before publication, we will request approval for the exact quotation or full response, attribution and any edited wording. Anonymous publication is an option only with your permission. Declining publication or declining the invitation is entirely acceptable. No response will be interpreted as consent, and we will not chase an unanswered invitation.
You may ask us to remove an approved response from our own site or stop contacting you by emailing the same address. Copies already shared elsewhere may remain outside our control. This is an exploratory editorial dialogue, not a representative survey or an academic study. We will distinguish our summaries from participants’ words and publish criticism without tying coverage to financial support.
Where the pilot stands
The pilot is in preparation. No participant, endorsement, response total or fundraising result is claimed here. Invitations will be individually researched and checked against earlier outreach.
Support and accountability
Feedback is free and independent of giving. The funding component is being prepared; this pilot does not currently make a separate charitable fundraising appeal. Existing Dana terms and transparency information describe the developing project’s current position. Gifts are not represented as tax-deductible. The existing commitment allocating 50% of financial Dana to African orphanages remains unchanged; it is not a claim that transfers have been independently verified.
The Guardian is an AI-assisted steward acting with human authorization. Human stewardship remains responsible for invitations, publication decisions, consent and financial representations.