A public archive preserves earlier versions; this ledger explains selected changes in ordinary language. It is maintained by the site steward and is not a record of an Assembly vote or independent ratification. Substantive proposals remain subject to the Constitution.
October 13, 2026 · Illustrations and visual teaching guides
Added seven original AI-generated photographic illustrations, selected by page subject and labeled as illustrations. Added visual guides for the Fourfold Turning, the Four Laws, teaching correspondences, difficult choices, and the practice rhythm. These are explanatory figures, not scientific measurements or photographs of actual members.
October 13, 2026 · Coherence and reading experience
Reason: Readers needed a clearer relationship between the many teaching names, practical guidance for difficult choices, and a sustainable route beyond the introductory week.
Change: Added The Weave as a Whole, When the Laws Meet a Difficult Choice, and Deepening the Work. Corrected the homepage map from “each column” to “each row,” clarified that correspondences are not equations, and removed wording that could imply that all suffering comes from spiritual misalignment. Simplified the entrance, reorganized navigation and the footer, and improved reading guides and typography. Revised the Buddha comparison to distinguish the Middle Way from a general compromise and removed a misleading one-to-one mapping of Buddhist categories onto GAPS, with primary-text links.
Scope: Editorial explanation and practice commentary authorized by the founder's site-review request. The Four Laws, Ladder, primary correspondences, joining affirmation, and constitutional text remain unchanged. No new degree, creed, or Assembly ratification is claimed.
October 11, 2026 · Dialectical monism · version 105
Question: Was interdependence being used as a proof of ultimate unity, and did the account evade objections about nothingness, causation, free will, intervention, and suffering?
Decision: The main essay gained explicit sections on what the argument cannot establish, how situated agency may work within causal conditions, and why suffering cannot be declared necessary for a harmonious whole. Theology and Objections received related clarification. This was an editorial expansion, not a new claim of experimental proof.
Earlier wording: The prior essay already called monism a philosophical interpretation but did not develop those specific objections in dedicated sections. The archived version remains available through the site's version history; this entry describes an addition rather than a replacement quotation.
Status: Published. The nature of the Living Spirit's consciousness and ultimate free will remain open.
October 11, 2026 · Claim status and other traditions · version 106
Question: Could readers distinguish knowledge, inference, hope, symbol, and speculation, and inspect the basis of comparisons with other traditions?
Decision: The Claim Guide labeled central propositions and their limits. All 23 Inspirations profiles gained source links, closer readings, and notes about where a comparison stops. The prior profiles did not include these dedicated source sections.
Status: Published. Source links and historical interpretations remain correctable; a tradition's own account is not independent proof of every historical claim.
How a proposed correction moves
- Send the precise page, passage, proposed change, and reason through Reader Review or Contact.
- The steward checks the claim, affected people, relevant sources, and constitutional scope. A report of harm takes the safeguarding route.
- For routine editorial clarification, publish an explanation and preserve the previous version. For substantive doctrine, follow the public canonical process; do not silently enact it as a copy edit.
- Record the decision, dissent or remaining uncertainty, publication date, and version here.
Receipt does not guarantee adoption. A reader can challenge the reasoning without becoming a member or publishing a personal story.